Ranked choice voting gives you the power to rank candidates from your favorite to your least favorite. On Election Night, all the ballots are counted for voters’ first choices. If one candidate receives an outright majority, he or she wins. If no candidate receives a majority, the candidate with the fewest first choices is eliminated and voters who liked that candidate the best have their ballots instantly counted for their second choice. This process repeats and last-place candidates lose until one candidate reaches a majority and wins. Your vote counts for your second choice only if your first choice has been eliminated.
Here is a one minute explanation from the City of Kingston:
Ensures Majority Support
Under our current system, it is possible for a candidate to win an election with only 20% of the votes. All across Ontario, each municipal election sends Councillors to office even when most of their constituents wanted someone else to win. Ranked ballot voting ensures that every successful candidate elected has the majority support of the voters.
Discourages Negative Campaigning
Under our current system, candidates often attack each other, throwing insults and accusations in an effort to discredit their opponents. This puts the focus on voting against a set of ideals rather than discussing what each candidate would do if elected. With ranked ballot voting these tactics work against you. To win, you have to appeal to a larger audience - including your opponents' supporters - in the hope that they might rank you second or third. This means more positive debates and more respectful and meaningful discussions.
Eliminates Vote Splitting
Under our current system, people spend more time talking about potential vote splitting than they do talking about the issues. Headlines are dominated by stories about who is dropping out or who is stealing votes from another candidate. With ranked ballot voting there is no such thing as vote splitting.
Provides More Choice for Voters
Under our current system, candidates are often forced to drop out of the race to avoid vote-splitting. Some of this happens in a very public manner. However, most of it happens months before the election as potential candidates are discouraged from entering the race. This frequently happens at the local level with new, eager candidates being asked not to run by their own colleagues. This is the exact opposite experience that we want candidates to have. With Ranked Ballot Voting, new voices would be welcomed and encouraged. This would lead to more choice, more voices, more engagement, and more diversity of ideas.
Reduces the Need for Strategic Voting
Under our current system, voters are often told to vote "strategically". With ranked ballot voting, you can always vote with your heart - not your calculator. You don't have to vote against something, you get to vote for something.
2018 is the first election in which Ontario municipalities are permitted to use ranked ballot voting (thanks to the Municipal Elections Modernization Act, 2016).
London, Ontario will be using ranked ballot voting in the 2018 election. They did not have a referendum, their council decided the benefits of ranked ballots were worth implementing right away.
Kingston and Cambridge, Ontario decided to put this decision in the hands of the people and are holding referendums to see if they should move to this voting system for the 2022 elections.
The people of Kingston, along with Cambridge, have the historic opportunity to be the first city in Canada to vote to implement a better electoral system.
A number of American cities use ranked ballots (called ranked choice voting or instant run-off voting) for some or all aspects of their municipal elections, including Berkeley, California; Cambridge, Massachusetts; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Oakland, California; Portland, Maine; San Francisco, California; San Leandro, California; Santa Fe, New Mexico; St. Paul, Minnesota; Takoma Park, Maryland; and Telluride, Colorado.
A number of other American cities have adopted or voted in favour of ranked ballot elections, which are now awaiting implementation.
In Britain all British mayors are elected with ranked ballots.
Canadian Political Parties
Canadian political parties have always used some form of runoff system to choose their leaders and to nominate the local candidates. Recently, all of Canada's parties have decided to use ranked ballots to choose their leaders. This change was made to boost internal democracy within the parties, allowing all members to vote - not just those who attend the convention.
The National Hockey League uses a ranked ballot to choose its Hart, Norris, Calder, Lady Byng, Selke, Vezina, and Jack Adams award winners every year - with points awarded based on where each player has been ranked. The National Basketball Association uses the same system to choose its top player awards as well.
The Academy Awards
In 2010, the Academy Awards adopted ranked ballots to choose Best Picture. This was done to avoid a situation where a movie could "win" with only 20% support in the Academy.
Canadian Sports Writers
In journalistic circles, the Canadian Press uses a ranked ballot for picking the Lionel Conacher Award, for Canada's male athlete of the year, and the Bobbie Rosenfeld Award, for Canada's best female athlete of the year.
Minneapolis (Minnesota), St. Paul (Minnesota), Cambridge (Massachusetts), and Takoma Park (Maryland) all experienced higher voter turnout after implementing ranked ballots for their elections. Both Oakland (California) and Santa Fe (New Mexico) implemented ranked ballot voting for mayoral contests and saw higher voter turnout.
For more information, see Drew Penrose, The Facts of Ranked Choice Voting: Voters Like It, High Turnouts are Trending (12 June 2008).
A study of the 2005 San Francisco city-wide election found that ranked ballot voting “increased voter turnout citywide by 2.7 times, and in the city’s most racially and socio-economically diverse neighborhoods turnout quadrupled.”
In the experience of many cities, ranked ballot voting has reduced negative campaigning.
A series of studies comparing cities using different voting systems found that cities using ranked ballot voting had significantly less negative campaigning.
Using a ranked ballot is not complicated.
Instead of checking off one choice, voters will rank from their favourite to their least favourite. We do this all the time: chocolate is my favourite ice cream, strawberry is my second favourite, and vanilla is my least favourite. This is the same, just with candidates for city council.
Cities that have used ranked ballots have found that people do not find using them complicated:
A 2009 study by St. Cloud State University found that 95% of Minneapolis voters felt ranked ballot voting was easy to use.
An exit poll conducted when Santa Fe, New Mexico first implemented ranked ballot voting found that 94% were satisfied with their voting experience, and 70% were very confident their ballot counted as intended (compare this to only 55% of New Mexico voters feeling that their vote would count as intended for the 2016 presidential election).
A study of two San Francisco ranked ballot elections found that “Voters of all races and ethnicities find [ranked ballot voting] easy to use.” This was based on exit polls conducted by the Public Research Institute at San Francisco State University, the Asian Law Caucus, and further analysis of ballots by Fair Vote.
The City of London, which will be using ranked ballots in the 2018 election, created this mock-up of the ballot they will use:
Much of the cost of using ranked ballots is going to be a one time cost, such as the cost for new ballot counting software and the cost for voter education to introduce the new system.
The best estimate we can do for cost is compare the City of Kingston, which would use ranked ballots in 2022, to the City of London, which will be using ranked ballots in the 2018 municipal election.
Looking at London's projected costs are a good indication for Kingston. However, we would expect Kingston's projected costs to be lower: London has 3 times the population of Kingston and its population has grown at a rate five times that of Kingston since the last municipal election. For comparison, London's 2014 election cost $1.7 million to run while Kingston's 2014 election cost $522 105.
London, with a population of 383 822 has estimated the additional cost for using ranked ballots in 2018 to be $200 000 (includes other factors, such as growth rate, which would raise the cost).
Given the Kingston's lower population and lower growth rate, one would expect the cost to be below London's estimated $200 000.
For more information about the City of London's use of ranked ballots in 2018, go to this article on tvo.org.
That seems rather specific to be a frequently asked question. But yes, Jennifer Lawrence supports ranked ballot voting.
When the Maine legislature nullified a statewide referendum approving ranked choice voting, Jennifer Lawrence got involved during the second referendum. Maine's second referendum on ranked choice voting was held at the same time voters were using ranked ballot voting to vote in the primaries. After having a chance to use ranked ballots and see how they work, Maine again voted in favour of using ranked ballots, this time with a larger margin than the first time.